Kenya softens its position on proposed closure of Dadaab refugee camp
Kenya softens its position on proposed closure of Dadaab refugee camp

Somalis arrive at Dadaab refugee camp in July 2011. The Kenyan’s government’s hardline stance on the camp’s closure following the Garissa University attack may be softening slightly. Photograph: Sipa Press/Rex Features
 

Kenya appears to have softened its stance on the imminent closure of a camp hosting more than a third of a million Somali refugees, weeks after the deputy president, reacting to the massacre at Garissa University, announced it would happen within three months.

“While we are committed to the return of the refugees, you will not see us holding them by the head and tail and throwing them across the border,” said Ali Bunow Korane, who chairs Kenya’s Refugee Affairs Commission.

Korane was addressing a gathering organised by the Rift Valley Institute’s Nairobi Forum, where officials from the UN, aid agencies and civil society discussed the implications of closing Dadaab refugee complex, where more than 330,000 Somalis live.

He acknowledged that, while it was Kenya’s policy to encourage refugees to go back to Somalia, the country, “does not provide a conducive environment for mass return”. This is also the position of the UNHCR, the UN’s agency for refugees, and most aid agencies working in Somalia.

Korane said Kenya was working to mobilise international support to improve security and build up social infrastructure such as houses, schools and hospitals, in order to make potential areas of return more viable.

On 11 April, William Ruto, Kenya’s deputy president, announced that the Kenyan government had asked the UNHCR “to relocate the refugees [in Dadaab] within three months, [failing] which we shall relocate them ourselves”.

Ruto spoke shortly after 148 people, mostly students, were murdered in a university in the northern town of Garissa, in an attack for which al-Shabab claimed responsibility. Although al-Shabab is primarily a Somali jihadist insurgency, it has recruited many Kenyans – including, by many accounts, some of those who carried out the university killings.

But Korane said of the attackers: “They stayed in the [Dadaab] refugee camp, they assembled the arms there.

“Kenya has very serious security challenges that have a direct bearing on refugees,” he added.

In 2013, Kenya, Somalia and the UNHCR signed a tripartite agreement in which all parties committed themselves to the principle of voluntary return. Kenya remains engaged with the tripartite process and, according to the UNHCR, on 29 April took part in a technical committee meeting convened to discuss the agreement’s implementation.

“The only way forward is to continue working for the implementation of the tripartite agreement,” the UNHCR’s senior regional protection officer, Eva Camps, said at the gathering.

Camps noted that a pilot project launched in December to assist refugees returning voluntarily from Dadaab to three locations in Somalia had not delivered satisfactory results. Of a target of 10,000 returns by June, so far just 2,048 have gone back under the project.

Several thousand others have, however, left Dadaab for Somalia without involvement from the UNHCR.